Comparison · prices as of 2026-07-04 · re-verified 2026-08-18

Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5.1

On price alone, GPT-5.1 (OpenAI) runs about 67% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.5 for a typical chat workload (2K input + 500 output tokens, 1,000 requests/day). Whether that's the right trade depends on the capability gap — the breakdown below shows where each one wins.

Price per million tokens

Spec Claude Opus 4.5 GPT-5.1
Input / MTok $5 $1.25
Output / MTok $25 $10
Context window 200K 400K
Max output 64K 128K
Class frontier frontier

Estimated monthly cost by workload

Same models, three realistic usage levels. The gap between them scales with volume, so the right pick can change as you grow.

Workload Claude Opus 4.5 GPT-5.1 Cheaper
Light — chatbot 0.5K in / 0.2K out · 200 req/day $45.00 $15.75 GPT-5.1
Typical — assistant 2K in / 0.5K out · 1K req/day $675 $225 GPT-5.1
Heavy — RAG / agent 8K in / 2K out · 5K req/day $13,500 $4,500 GPT-5.1

Which should you pick?

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-5.1 cheaper?

GPT-5.1 is cheaper — roughly 67% less per month on a typical assistant workload (2K input + 500 output tokens, 1,000 requests/day).

What do Claude Opus 4.5 and GPT-5.1 cost per million tokens?

Claude Opus 4.5 is $5 per million input tokens and $25 per million output. GPT-5.1 is $1.25 input and $10 output. Prices are first-party API list rates as of 2026-07-04.

Which has the larger context window, Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-5.1?

GPT-5.1 does, at 400K tokens versus 200K for Claude Opus 4.5.

When should I choose Claude Opus 4.5 over GPT-5.1?

Both are frontier-class models, so choose Claude Opus 4.5 when it measurably wins on your own evals or you prefer its provider (Anthropic); otherwise GPT-5.1 does the same job for less.

Related comparisons

Sources: Anthropic pricing · OpenAI pricing. Run your own numbers in the cost calculator.