Comparison · prices as of 2026-07-04 · re-verified 2026-08-18

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5

On price alone, Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) runs about 40% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.5 for a typical chat workload (2K input + 500 output tokens, 1,000 requests/day). Whether that's the right trade depends on the capability gap — the breakdown below shows where each one wins.

Price per million tokens

Spec Claude Opus 4.5 Claude Sonnet 4.5
Input / MTok $5 $3
Output / MTok $25 $15
Context window 200K 200K
Max output 64K 64K
Class frontier workhorse

Estimated monthly cost by workload

Same models, three realistic usage levels. The gap between them scales with volume, so the right pick can change as you grow.

Workload Claude Opus 4.5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Cheaper
Light — chatbot 0.5K in / 0.2K out · 200 req/day $45.00 $27.00 Claude Sonnet 4.5
Typical — assistant 2K in / 0.5K out · 1K req/day $675 $405 Claude Sonnet 4.5
Heavy — RAG / agent 8K in / 2K out · 5K req/day $13,500 $8,100 Claude Sonnet 4.5

Which should you pick?

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5 cheaper?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is cheaper — roughly 40% less per month on a typical assistant workload (2K input + 500 output tokens, 1,000 requests/day).

What do Claude Opus 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 cost per million tokens?

Claude Opus 4.5 is $5 per million input tokens and $25 per million output. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $3 input and $15 output. Prices are first-party API list rates as of 2026-07-04.

Which has the larger context window, Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?

Both handle up to 200K tokens of context.

When should I choose Claude Opus 4.5 over Claude Sonnet 4.5?

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 when you need the extra capability of its frontier class; drop to Claude Sonnet 4.5 when speed and cost matter more than peak quality.

Related comparisons

Sources: Anthropic pricing · Anthropic pricing. Run your own numbers in the cost calculator.